JEET SINGH @ AJIT SINGH (now deceased) through LR v. ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS
CMPMO/44/2026 · 2026-09-28
Virender Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25229 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25229 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:42164 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. : 44 of 2026 Decided on : 28.09.2026 Jeet Singh @ Ajit Singh (deceased) through LR Jasbir Singh …Petitioner Versus Anil Kumar & Others
…Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Mohinder Verma & Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Nand Lal Thakur,
Advocate.
Virender Singh, Judge
(Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the
order dated 21.11.2025, passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge, Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned trial Court’), in CMA No. 286 of
2025.
2. By way of order dated 21.11.2025, the learned trial Court has allowed the application filed by the respondents under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC read with Section 151 CPC, by setting aside the exparte order dated 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2 2026:HHC:42164 07.03.2025 and permitted the respondents to join the proceedings, subject to cost of Rs. 3,000/.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties to the lis, are, hereinafter, referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by the learned trial Court.
4. The plaintiff is before this Court, against the
order dated 21.11.2025. The learned trial Court, while allowing the application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, has discussed the stand taken by the parties to the lis and thereafter, allowed the application, which does not require any interference, by this Court, that too, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. As such, the petition is dismissed, however, the learned trial Court is directed to first decide the applications under Order 8 Rule 1A CPC and under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC, moved by the plaintiff, which, are stated to be still pending adjudication before proceeding further.
5. With these observations, the present petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands
disposed of.
(Virender Singh) 28th September, 2026 Judge (Pramod Kumar)