Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25229 (HP)

JEET SINGH @ AJIT SINGH (now deceased) through LR v. ANIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

CMPMO/44/2026 · 2026-09-28

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:42164 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.  : 44 of 2026 Decided on    : 28.09.2026 Jeet Singh @ Ajit Singh (deceased) through LR Jasbir Singh …Petitioner Versus Anil Kumar & Others …Respondents The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr.   Mohinder   Verma   &   Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr.   Nand   Lal   Thakur, Advocate. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 21.11.2025, passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge, Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned trial Court’), in CMA No. 286 of 2025. 2. By way of order dated 21.11.2025, the learned trial   Court   has   allowed   the   application   filed   by   the respondents under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC read with Section 151   CPC,   by   setting   aside   the   ex­parte   order   dated 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:42164 07.03.2025   and   permitted   the   respondents   to   join   the proceedings, subject to cost of Rs. 3,000/­. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties to the lis, are, hereinafter, referred to, in the same manner, in which, they were referred to, by the learned trial Court. 4. The plaintiff is before this Court, against the order dated 21.11.2025.   The learned trial Court, while allowing the application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, has discussed the stand taken by the parties to the lis and thereafter, allowed the application, which does not require any interference, by this Court, that too, under Article 227 of   the   Constitution   of   India.     As   such,   the   petition   is dismissed, however, the learned trial Court is directed to first decide the applications under Order 8 Rule 1­A CPC and under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC, moved by the plaintiff, which, are stated to be still pending adjudication before proceeding further. 5. With these observations, the present petition is dismissed.  Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands disposed of. (Virender Singh) 28th September, 2026 Judge (Pramod Kumar)