Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30246 WP No. 6312 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6312 OF 2026 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN:
1.
M. GURURAJ S/O LATE R. MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RANGANATHA NAGARA, SIRA TOWN, KASABA HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKURU-572137. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDI BENGALURU-560001.
2.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION, MADHUGIRI-572132.
3.
THE THASILDAR, SIRA TALUK, SIRA TUMAKUR DISTRICT-572137.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30246 WP No. 6312 of 2026
4.
T. RAMAKRISHNACHAR S/O THIMMACHAR SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
PADMAMMA @ PADMAKSHAMMA, W/O LATE T. RAMAKRISHNACHAR, SAPTAGIRI LAYOUT, SIRA-572137, TUMKURU DISTRICT-572137.
5.
VISHNU K.H., NEW BUS STAND ROAD, SIRA TOWN, SIRA - 572137.
6. KARIYAPPA S/O THORIYAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
RANGANATHA, S/O LATE KARIYAPPA.
7. KAMBAIAH S/O KARIYAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
RANGANATHAPPA, S/O LATE KAMBAIAH.
MARIYAPPA, S/O LATE SANNA KADIRAPPA
8. THORIYAPPA S/O KARIYAPPA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
RAJANNA, S/O LATE THORIYAPPA
RANGAIAH S/O PARASAPPA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30246 WP No. 6312 of 2026
9.
SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
R. KAMBANNA, S/O LATE RANGAIAH
RESPONDENTS NO. 6 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT RANGANATHA NAGARA SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 57213. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.09.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER IN LND(A)03/2018-19 AT ANNEXURE-A;
DIRECT QUASHING OR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.02.2026, PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 HEREIN THE TAHSILDAR IN RRTDISP/564/2025 AT ANNX-B;
AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30246 WP No. 6312 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 11.09.2019 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2, inter alia sought for quashing the order dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure-B) passed by respondent No.3.
2. It is the contention of Sri. Ravishankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that the land in question was granted to the grandmother of the petitioner - Lakkamma as per M.R.No.37/77-78. It is argued that the mutation entry has been changed without hearing the petitioner and accordingly,
learned counsel sought for interference of this Court.
3. Per contra, Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3, submitted that, the petitioner herein or his grandmother are not parties in the proceedings before respondent No.2(Annexure-A), and further the same has been challenged after a period of six years and no reasons have been assigned and accordingly, sought for dismissal of the Writ Petition.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30246 WP No. 6312 of 2026
4. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful consideration of the Writ papers would indicate that the petitioner has not produced the order of grant before this Court except Annexure-D, wherein mutation has been made in M.R. No.37/77-78. It is also pertinent to mention that, grandmother of the petitioner - Lakkamma is not a party in the proceedings in LND(A)/03:2018-19, as per Annexure-A. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition cannot be accepted.
5. Despite the fact that the petitioner or his grandmother is not a party in Annexure-A, as there is delay of six years in challenging Annexure-A, and by looking into the averments made in the Writ Petition, I am of the view that, no acceptable reasons have been stated to quash the Order dated 11.09.2019 passed by respondent No.2.
6. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21