MD. BASIR ANSARI @ BASIR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8244/2026 · 2026-09-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25221 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25221 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:26794] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8244 of 2026
------ Md. Basir Ansari @ Basir Ansari, aged about 30- years, S/O Md. Ajimuddin Ansari, R/o, Kudiya Dhar, Natundih, Jangalpur, P.O.- and P.S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-07-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.201 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303(2), 317(4), 317(5), 112(2) & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of iron pipes and loading the same in a truck. It is next submitted that the allegations against him the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the only role played by the petitioner is that the petitioner was loading the pipes in the truck and he has no knowledge about alleged iron pipe being stolen property. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 03.09.2026 passed in B.A. No.8196 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-09 of this bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during
the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.201 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.09.2026 Amar/