The Settibalija Welfare Association, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/12882/2026 · 2026-05-05
Nyapathy Vijay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010244402026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12882 OF 2026 Between:
1. The Settibalija Welfare Association,, Regd No. 1432/2019 Eluru District, rep by its President KodeDurgaRao, S/o Venkateswararao, aged about 49 years ,Do.No.14-2,Punymurthulavari street. Power pet, Eluru, Eluru Dist. Pincode. 534002
2. Vendra Naga Raju, S/o Sri Rama Murthy, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Business, R/o D.No.2-6-1, Main Road,Chintalapadu Village, Pulaparru P.0, MandavalliMandal, Eluru Dt. Pincode 534199
3. Vanum Vani Suguna, W/o vanumu Rajesh aged about 35 years, R/o D.No. 2-611, Ragisetti Center Near Ramalayam Temple, Komadavole Village, Eluru Mandal, West Godavari Dt, Pincode. 534004 ...Petitioners AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department, Secretariat
Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati.522237
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Ex-Officio Secretary to Governament Backward Classes Welfare (F)Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati. Pincode. 522237
3. The District Collector cum Competent Authority, under AP (Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Backward classes) regulation of issue of Community Certificates, Eluru District, Eluru 534006
2
4. The Chairman/ Joint Collector, District Level Scrutiny Committee(DLSC) Eluru District,Eluru.Pincode 534006
5. The District Prohibition and Excise Officer, Eluru District, Eluru. Pincode 534001
6. Baireddy Vijay Kumar, S/o Byreddy Venkata Ramana, Aged about major, R/o 3-247, Chataparru Village,Eluru Mandal, Eluru District, Pincode. 534007 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus todeclaringthe impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent in memo no. 3230860/BCW/F/2026 dated 23/04/2026 against the orders of the District collector Eluru in ROC No. C4/E/98007/2025 dt 19/04/2026 on cancellation of the Settibalija Caste Certificate of the 6th respondent without issued notice and giving an opurtunity to the petitioners to submit their submissions even though,they filed caveat petition dt 22-4-2026 is highly illegal arbitrary apart from violative of principles natural justice and violative of artcle 14,15,16,19 and 21 of the constitution of india and set aside the same and consequentially to suspend the impugned proceedings in memo no.
3230860/BCW/F/2026 dated 23/04/2026 of the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings in memo no. 3230860/BCW/F/2026 dated 23/04/2026 of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioners: BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE Counsel for the Respondents:MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following order:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Writ Petition No:12882 /2026 O R DE R:
The Writ Petition is filed questioning the Memo dated 23.04.2026 issued by the Respondent No.2 vide bearing No.3230860/BCW/F/2026, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Respondent No.6 claims to be the member of the Settibalija BC-B community and had secured permission for running the liquor shop. A dispute was raised by the Petitioner’s association stating that the Respondent No.6 does not belong to the Settibalija community to be allotted a liquor license. The District Collector, after thorough enquiry, vide Orders dated 19.04.2026 in ROC No. Roc.No.C4/E/98007/2025, had annulled the Community Certificate of the Respondent No. 6 while directing the District Prohibition and Excise to cancel the license issued to the Respondent No. 6. Questioning the same, the Respondent No. 6 filed an appeal before the Government under Rule 11 (1) of the Rules. On 23.04.2026, the respondent No. 2 passed interim orders staying the operation of the Orders of the District Judge. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the District Collector had given a Report dated 19.04.2026, taking note of all the
4
documents and the contentions of the Respondent No.6 and the immediate relatives of the Respondent No.6 and the impugned Order without giving any reason cannot be sustained. He further submits that the Petitioner, being the complainant, ought to have given a notice before passing the impugned order.
4. Respondent No. 6 filed a caveat, and Sri P. Rajasekhar, learned counsel, appeared on behalf of Sri M. Sree Rama Rao and submits that reasons need not be assigned at this stage and that the Petitioners do not have any locus standi to maintain the Writ Petition as they do not come under personally aggrieved parties.
5. Heard the learned respective counsel.
6. The issue involved in this Writ Petition is only with regard to the stay granted by the Appellate Authority. As rightly contended by the
learned counsel for the petitioner, the impugned Order does not contain any prima facie reasons to grant a stay of the Orders of the District Collector. However, rather than going back and forth on the issue of the stay, this Court feels that it would be appropriate to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible, rather than keeping the appeal pending.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:
5
i) The Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to dispose of the Appeal filed by the Respondent No.6 questioning the Orders passed by the District Collector, Eluru, in Roc.No.C4/E/98007/2025, dated 19.04.2026 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. ii) There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 06.05.2026 eha
6
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.12882 of 2026 Dated: 06.05.2026 (d)
eha