25.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.73 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 883 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kaliganj Police Station Case No. 511 of 2025 dated 13.06.2025 under Sections 103(2)/109/117(2)/118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Ramij Sk. ... Petitioner. Mr. Kushal Kumar Mukherjee, Mr. Arijit Bose ... For the Petitioner. Dr. Pradip Banerjee, APP, Ms. Hasi Saha ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 121 days, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner’s name is not there in the FIR, but has been forcefully implicated in course of the trial. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the witnesses including the post mortem report. I have taken into account the materials which are appearing. Petitioner has been named by some of the eyewitnesses relied upon in the charge-sheet. Having considered the stage of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. 2 Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 883 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)