Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25213 (AP)

SIKHA SALOMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/28963/2024 · 2026-03-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010552672024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 28963/2024 Between: 1. SIKHA SALOMI, W/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O THIMIDITHAPADU, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT-523170, ANDHRA PRADESH. CELL 9848153714 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, .BAPATLA DISTRICT BAPATLA. 5. THE DISTRICT CIVIL SUPPLY OFFICER, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, KARAMCHEDU, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 8. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR CIVIL SUPPLIES, KARAMCHEDU, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2 9. VRA VILLAGE REVENUE ASSISTANT, THIMIDITHAPADU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents No.6 and7 in not hand over the FP Shop No 0822028 to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No.6 and 7 to hand over the FP Shop No 0822028 to the petitioner forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that this Hon’ble Court in the interest of Justice be pleased to direct the Respondents No.6 and 7 to hand over the FP Shop No: 0822028 to the petitioner forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.6 to file counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: On 07.03.2025, 21.03.2025, 21.01.2026 & 18.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th March, 2026 RKS