2026:JHHC:26424 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6104 of 2026 ---------- Jahid Ansari, son of Aziz Ansari, aged about 42 years, resident of Marheta, P.O. & P.S. Marheta, District Hazaribag. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Police Headquarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Arms Police, Ranchi, Jharkhand Police Headquarter, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Commandant- JAP-07, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, JAP-07-cum-Enquiry Officer, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S. Hazaribag, District Hazaribag. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kr. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V ---------- 02/ 31.08.2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for following reliefs: i) For quashing of Memo No.203 dated 22.05.2025 [Annexure-4] passed by the Commandant-JAP-07, Hazaribag whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service for absent of 10 days without giving finding that it is deliberate delay by the petitioner. ii) For quashing of the Memo No.560 dated 20.08.2025 [Annexure-6] passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, JAP, A Ranchi whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner against Memo No.203 dated 22.05.2025 [Annexure-4] passed by the Commandant-JAP-07, Hazaribag was rejected without giving finding upon the grounds taken by the petitioner in the memo of appeal. iⅲ) For direction upon the respondents i.e. Director General of Police, Ranchi to decide the Appeal/ Memorial preferred by the petitioner vide dated 20.01.2026 [Annexure-7], which is still pending before the Respondent No.2. iv) For direction upon the respondents to pay all the consequential benefits to the petitioners after setting aside the dismissal order passed by the Commandant, JAP-7, Hazaribag vide Memo No.203 dated 22.05.2025 [Annexure-4] passed by the Commandant-JAP-07, Hazaribag and appellate order vide Memo No.560 dated 20.08.2025 [Annexure-7] passed by Deputy Inspector General of Police, JAP, Ranchi. 2026:JHHC:26424 2 2. Though the petitioner has made several prayers including quashing of the order of termination but at this stage learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the memorial of the petitioner is pending before the respondent No. 2, as such, he may be directed to dispose of the same at the earliest. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that since counter- affidavit has not been filed, he is unable to state the current status of the memorial preferred by the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the limited submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the memorial pending before him strictly in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. 5. As a result, the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 31st August, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded 08.09.2026