APHC010551682024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4586/2024 Between: 1. M/S GANESH SAI CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI RAMANAIDU THOKALA, S/O.KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 5-165, KANDHUKURU MANDAL MOPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING MKTGM DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI S DILLI RAO IAS, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, VIJAYAWADA, 2 NTR DISTRICT. 5. SRI B BALU NAIK, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 6. SRI G BRAMAIAH, FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ CIRCLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI G RATNA BABU, FATHER S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PR.PIU DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 11680 of 2024 dated 25.09.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3 The Court made the following Order: Both the learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that, the order under contempt has already been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this contempt case. 2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt case and accordingly, it is closed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 02.01.2026 NNN