1 CGHC010251972026 2026:CGHC:27608 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 592 of 2026 1 - Jayprakash Yadav (Died) Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 04-10-2024. 1.1 - Chandrika Bai W/o Jayprakash Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Katra, Tahsil And P.S.Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 1.2 - Aman Yadav S/o Jayprakash Yadav Aged About 10 Years Minor, Represented Through Legal Guardian And Mother Chandrika Bai, W/o Jayprakash Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Katra, Tahsil And P.S.Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 1.3 - Piyush Yadav S/o Jayprakash Yadav Aged About 5 Years Minor, Represented Through Legal Guardian And Mother Chandrika Bai, W/o Jayprakash Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Katra, Tahsil And P.S.Baloda, Distt. Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1 - Dinesh Kumar Rathore S/o Sitaram Rathore Aged About 42 Years R/o Budgahan, Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa, At Present R/o Parijat Extension, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - M/s D.C.Construction, Through The Partner M.I.G.-17, Parijat Extension, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Oriental Insurance Company Through The Branch Manager, Rajeev Plaza, Bus Stand, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Office Reference Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/07/2026 1. The matter is listed for orders on PUD sent by the Judge 2nd Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Bilaspur, C.G. through the Principal District Judge, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) dated 16.6.2026 requesting for extension of further more time for disposal of the case bearing Claim Case No. 651/2014 (Jay Prakash Yadav vs. Dinesh Kumar Rathore & others). 2. On 14.08.2025, while remanding the matter back to the learned Claims Tribunal, this Court had directed the concerned Tribunal to decide the case within a period of four months from 25.09.2025 but the proceeding could not complete within four months. By the 3 PUD under consideration, the concerned Court has prayed for further more time for deciding the case. 3. The request made by the learned concerned Court appears to be genuine and, therefore, three months further more time is granted from the next date of hearing of the case to ensure disposal of the case. 4. The concerned Judge is directed to make all the endevour for disposal of the case within time. 5. Accordingly, the MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat