Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25203 (AP)

P.Geetha Supriya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25887/2018 · 2026-02-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010544672018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 25887/2018 Between: 1. P.GEETHA SUPRIYA, D/O.P.RAMANAIAH, AGE.39 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (TECHNICAL), APTRANSCO, O/O.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OMC CIRCLE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT-524413. 2. P.VENKATESHWARLU,, S/O.P.NAGAIAH, AGE.42 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (EHT LINES) APTRANSCO, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522001. 3. A.BULLIBABU,, S/O.ADAM, AGE.36 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION), APTRANSCO, TLC SUB-DIVISION-I, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522004. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522020. 2. THE TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, VIDYUTH SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA - 520004 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR, (FINANCE, COMML, IPC, HRD AND IT) TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VIDYUTH SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA – 520004. 2 4. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HRD AND PLANNING, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., VIDYUTH SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA – 520004. 5. SRI TIRUMALA CHANDRA MOULI, AGED. 37 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APTRANSCO, KADAPA ZONE. 6. VUTLA RAMESH BABU, AGED. 41 YEARS, OCC.ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APTRANSCO, VIJAYAWADA ZONE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS BOBBILI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.25887 OF 2018 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioners either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioners. 2. Learned GP for Energy is in attendance. Sri P.Ramu, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL is in attendance. 3. It appears that the writ petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 26.02.2026 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 90 WRIT PETITION No:25887 OF 2018 Date: 26.02.2026 W PSK