Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25198 (AP)

Soka Padmamma v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/29281/2025 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010550162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29281 of 2025 Between: 1. SOKA PADMAMMA, W/O LATE PENCHALAYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. GALI NARASIAH,, S/O LATE PENCHALIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 3. YINJETI PAPAIAH, S/O PENCHALIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 4. MUTYAM RATNAMMA, W/O LATE PENCHALIAH, LR WIFE MUTYAM RATNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 5. ADURU BHUDEVI, W/O LATE SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. MUTYAM PENCHALASWAMI, S/O LATE PENCHALAIAH,AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 7. PINGANI VENKATARAMANA REDDY, S/O LATE MEERA REDDY,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 8. BODA PENCHALAIAH, S/O SUBBAIAH,AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 9. GUNJI LAKSHMAIAH, S/O CHENCHURAMAIAH,AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 10. GUNJI CHENCHAI, S/O LATE RAMAIAH,LR SON GUNJI CHENCHAIAH,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 11. CHALIA SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 12. ALLURU SRINIVASAMMA, W/O M. PENCHALASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 65 13. AVULA NARASIMHALU, S/O LATE SUBBARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 14. AVULA NARASIMHULU, S/O LAT SUBBRAMAIAH AGED 40 YEARS 15. DUGGINERI SUBRAMANYAM, S/O LATE SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 16. BOMMITETTU YANADAMMA, W/O LATE PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 2 17. ALAKUNTA RAJAIAH, S/O. LATE ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 18. SAGILI PENCHALAIAH, S/O. LATE NARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 19. DHANAM SUBBARAMAIAH, S/O, POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 20. TIRUMALASHETTY RASOOL, S/O. MEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 21. DUGGINETI CHIRM POLAIAH, S/O LATE PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YRS. 22. 22. TIRUMALASHETTI MASTAN, S/O RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 55 YS. 23. 23. DHANUM RAVI, S/O SIABANMIAH, ABOUT 40 YEARS. 24 24. DUGGINETI POLAIAH, S/O PEDDA POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 25. 25. PANTHAGIRI SURESH, S/O LATE VENKATAIAH LR SON P. SURESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 26. PINGANI JAYANMA,, W/O. LATE PENCHALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 27. INDLA PENCHALA NARASAMMA, D/O VENKATESAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 28. PANTHAGIRI PRASAD, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 29. BELLAMPALLI RAMANAMMA, W/O GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 30. DUGGINETI PENCHALAIAH, S/O PENCHALA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 31. DUGGINETI PEDA MALLAIAH, S/O PENCHALA RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 32. GALI ANKAIAH, S/O LATE PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 33. DUGGINATE VENKATA RAMANAIAH, S/O LATE ANKAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE RESIDENTS OF GUNDAVOLU VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, S P S R NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT SECRETARIATBUILDINGS,VELAGAPIKLI, AMARAVATHI, 3 GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER R AND R, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. NTR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SPECIAL COLLECTORLA, TELUGU GANGA PROJECT NEELAGIRI SANGAM, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (LA) TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, RAPUR AT NELLORE UNIT), NEELAGIRI SANGAM, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NEHCWE DISTRICT 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SSLC AND SB DIVISIORVI, DARGAMITTA, OPP NGO HOME, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits to the petitioners under rehabilitatuion and resettlement scheme and as provided by the Government under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extend the benefits under rehabilitation and resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the orcder issued under GO Rt no 641 Water Respurces R and R A2 Department dated 14-09-2016. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 4 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; <….to issue a writ mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits to the petitioners under rehabilitation and resettlement scheme and as provided by the Government under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extend the benefits under rehabilitation and resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the order issued under GO Rt. No. 641 Water Resources (R &R-A2) Department dated 14-09-2016.= 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners V.Jagadeesh seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ D. RAMESH, J Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK 5 186 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29281 of 2025 Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK