( 2026:JHHC:26978 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8233 of 2026 Rahul Yadav son of Manoj Yadav … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. --- 02/08.09.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Basantrai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 64 & 74 of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda, Jharkhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2026. Charge has already been framed but no witness has been examined. He submits that it has come during investigation by the police that both the petitioner and the victim were working in Haryana and the victim happens to be the married lady having child. As per the allegation, the incident had taken place in Haryana on 04.09.2025 wherein she has stated that she informed the allegation of rape to the Police at Haryana, but the police did not take any action and then she came back and again the incident had taken place in the District of Godda, Jharkhand where the petitioner entered in the house of the victim and tried to outrage her modesty. The learned counsel has submitted that since charge has been framed, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner which are based on the basis of materials available on record. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties considering the fact that charge has already been framed, the petitioner, above named, ( 2026:JHHC:26978 ) 2 is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda, in connection with Basantrai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not disturb the victim in any manner and if any complain is found against the petitioner, the victim shall take appropriate steps against the petitioner. (ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (iii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. 7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 08.09.2026 Uploaded on 08.09.2026 Binit/