Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25189 (AP)

TAIDUPATI ADEMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/29280/2025 · 2026-01-07

D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010549642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29280/2025 Between: 1. TAIDUPATI ADEMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 2. ALAKUNTA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 3. PANTHAGIRI RATNAMMA, W/O VERTETESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 4. YAKASIRI RATNAMMA, W/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 5. PANTAGIRI RATNAIAH SUNDARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 6. TAIDUPATAI POLAIAH, S/O. PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 7. ALAKUNTA CHINNA PENCHALAIAH, S/O PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 8. BITRAGUNTA DASHAIAH, S/O VENGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 9. BOMMITATTU PENCHALAIAH, S/O NARASIMHULU, AGED 55 YEARS. 10. KOTHAPALLI ARUNA, W/O SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 11. KADIRI VENKATESWARLU, S/O NARASIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 12. BODA RAVI, S/O SUTOAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 13. GUNJI VENKATESWARLU, S/O SEENAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 14. ALAKUNTA PAPAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATAIAH, LR SON A.PAPAIAH, ABOUT 45 YEARS. 15. ALAKUNTE PAPAIAH, S/O. LATE VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, 16. DUGGINETI PENCHALAIAH, S/O LATE ANKAIAH, LR 2 SON DUGGINETI PENCHALIAH, AGED ABOUTT 60 YEARS. 17. DUGGINETI PENCHALAIAH, S/O LATE ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 18. ALAKUNTA PARANDAMAIAH, LATE VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 19. ALAKUNTA VENKALAMMA, W/O LATE VENKATAIAH, LR WIFE ALAKUNTE VENKATAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 20. ALAKUNTA PENCHALAMMA, W/O LATE NARASIAH LR WIFE ALAKUNTA PENCHALAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 21. ALAKUNTE SRIHARI, S/O PENCHALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 22. ALAKUNTA VENUGOPAL, S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 23. ALAKUNTA SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 24. CHALLA VENKATESWARLU, S/O LATE CHINNA VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 25. BANDI PAPAMMA, W/O LATE ANKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 26. ANKULPALLI MAHENDRA, S/O ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE COMMISSIONER R R, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. 4. THE SPECIAL COLLECTORLA TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, NEELAGIRI SANGAM, NELLORE TCWVN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR IA TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, RAPUR AT NELLORE( UNIT), NEELAGIRI SANGAM, NJORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SSLC SB DIVISION-T DARGAMITTA. OPP NGO HOME, NELLORE CITY, SPSR 3 NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits the petitioner under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme and as provided by the Government Under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extend the benefits under Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the orders issued under GO RLNo.641 Water Resources (RR A2) Department dated 14-9-2016. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATA RAMANA RAO BATCHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 4 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the benefits the petitioner under Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme and as provided by the Government Under different orders issued from time to time as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to extend the benefits under Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme to the petitioners including cost of construction of houses as per the orders issued under GO RLNo.641 Water Resources (RR A2) Department dated 14-9-2016.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. V.Jagadeesh seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ D. RAMESH, J Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK 5 165 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29280 of 2025 Date:08.01.2026 RMD/JAK