- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31849 MFA No. 327 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.327 OF 2025 (LAC) BETWEEN: THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (WORKS) SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY YADAVAGIRI, MYSURU - 570 020. …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. MARAMKAMMA W/O. S.KEMPEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS. 1. SRI C.K.PUTTARAMU S/O. LATE KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT CHINDAGIRIKOPPALU VILLAGE K.SHETTAHALLI HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 807. 2. THE SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OFFICE OF SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICERS PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION PANDAVAPURA MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31849 MFA No. 327 of 2025 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 23 OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN L.A.C. NO.2/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. SRIRANGAPATNA AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 24.06.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. SRIRANGAPATNA IN L.A.C.NO.2/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE CLAIM PETITION BY CONFIRMING THE AWARD DATED `15.03.2013 PASSED BY THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER IN CASE NO.L.A.Q.(2)159/2010-11 RELATING TO THE PROPERTY BEARING SY.NO.93/2 MEASURING 0.02 GUNTAS SITUATED AT CHANDAGIRI KOPPALU VILLAGE, K.SHETTAHALI HOBLI-1, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Registry has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal in view of the judgment of this Court reported in ILR 2011 KAR 499. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that the subject value does not exceed ₹10,00,000/-. 3. In view of the same, the present appeal is not maintainable. Therefore, the objection raised by Registry is sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31849 MFA No. 327 of 2025 4. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to file such proceedings as may be permissible in law before the appropriate Forum. 5. The time spent in agitating the matter before this Court, shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. 6. Registry is directed to return the certified copies, if any, filed along with the appeal to the appellant. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10