Jyotish Kumar @ Jyotish Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./28520/2026 · 2026-07-17
Rajiv Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25183 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25183 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28520 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2025 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka ======================================================
1. Jyotish Kumar @ Jyotish Yadav Son of Parmeshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Gaura, (Manjhdih), Ps- Anandpur, Dist- Banka
2. Babloo Kuamr @ Badlu Kumar @ Bablu Kumar son of Lalu yadav Resident of Village- Gaura, (Manjhdih), Ps- Anandpur, Dist- Banka
3. Pawan Turi @ Pawan Kumar son of Tulsi Turi @ Munhsi Turi Resident of Village- Gaura, (Manjhdih), Ps- Anandpur, Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 17-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Anandpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2025 instituted under Sections 304(2) of the BNS lodged on 19.03.2026 by the informant, Gaurav Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that after collecting Rs.22,766/-, while he was returning, the unknown criminals on motorcycle snatched the money alongwith tab and I.D. This led to the F.I.R.
4. Subsequently, during investigation, Ashok Yadav was apprehended and he spilled the beans and named the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28520 of 2026(3) dt.17-07-2026 2/2 associates, the petitioner included.
5. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court about his innocence, learned APP submits that the case diary clearly shows that this petitioner actively participated in the occurrence.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, no relief can be extended.
7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T