1 APHC010550892022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496/2022 Between: 1. G THULASAMMA, W/O. SURI BABU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER (SUSPENSION), SHOP NO. 1203006, J. KOTTAKAT VILLAGE, VIDAPANAKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KETHAN KARGH, JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 2. RAVINDRANATH, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. BHRAMMAIAH, THASILDAR, VIDAPANAKAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for contempt of courts of the Hon'ble High court for willful violation of the orders of this Hontle court dated 29.07.2022 passed in W.P. No. 23373 of 2022 by the Lordships Mr. Justice Battu Devanand under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully and intentionally disobeying the orders and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496 OF 2022 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 29.07.2022 passed in W.P.No.23373 of 2022 by the respondents. 2. During the course of hearing today, Mr Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the respondents has not complied with the orders of this Court in W.P.No.23373 of 2022, dated 29.07.2022 within the time stipulated and subsequently after two (2) months it was complied with. He further submits that in compliance of the order in the writ petition, respondents have also issued the proceedings and the same was challenged before this Court in different Writ Petition. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, in the considered opinion of this Court, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. However, it is made clear that the respondents shall be more vigilant and careful in future in implementing the orders of the Court in true letter and spirit. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 02.01.2026 TM 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4496 OF 2022 Date: 02.01.2026 TM