Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25172 (KAR)

POORNAPRAJNA HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED v. MR K R ANIL KUMAR

WP/18036/2026 · 2026-06-30

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32388-DB WP No. 18036 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 18036 OF 2026 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: 1. POORNAPRAJNA HOUSE BUILDING CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.552, POORNA PRAJNA SUVARNA BHAVANA, 1ST FLOOR, UTTARAHALLI KENGERI MAIN ROAD, POORNA PRAJNA NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 061 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR. HAYAGREEVACHAR …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S.NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAG S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR K R ANIL KUMAR SON OF LATE MR. K.H. RAMANNA, MAJOR IN AGE, RESIDING AT NO. 1395, FLAT NO. 202, SIRI SKY WOOD, 43RD MAIN, NEAR NEW KUMARAN SCHOOL, POORNA PRAJNA LAYOUT, UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 061 …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04/11/2025 (AT ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32388-DB WP No. 18036 of 2026 THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.NC/IA/17840/2024 FILED IN REVISION PETITION NO.NC/RP/1850/2024, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present writ petition has been filed impugning the order dated 04.11.2025 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Hereinafter referred to as 'the National Commission') New Delhi, in Revision Petition No.1850/2024, whereby the objections of the petitioner regarding maintainability of revision petition has been rejected. 2. From the provisions of Section 58 read with Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (for brevity 'the Act') it is evident that against the order passed by the State Commission in Appeal, the remedy available to an aggrieved person is to file a revision petition before the National Commission. 3. We are therefore, of the considered view that by rejecting the objections to the maintainability of the revision petition, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32388-DB WP No. 18036 of 2026 National Commission has correctly interpreted the provision of Act. 4. We find no ground to interfere with the impugned order dated 04.11.2025 passed in Revision Petition No.1850/2024. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 5. However, we request the National Commission to decide the said Revision Petition expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5