Chhotak Tiwari @ Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari v. The State of Bihar
CR. APP (SJ)/841/2026 · 2026-07-17
Rajiv Roy
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25169 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25169 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.841 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Chhotak Tiwari @ Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari S/O Ashok Tiwari R/O Village- Barisvan, P.S- Shahpur, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Meena Devi W/O Ramji Ram R/O Village- Barisvan, P.S- Shahpur, Distt.- Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2026 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and the State.
2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside the
order dated 13.01.2026 passed by learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS and section 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. As per the FIR, the informant alleged that when she went to see the injured, Shilli Devi in her house, the accused
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.841 of 2026(2) dt.17-07-2026 2/2 persons, armed variously, came and assaulted as a result whereof, she became unconscious. Specific allegation against this appellant is that he was carrying an axe in his hand and the assault also records that she was given axe blow. This led to the FIR.
4. Later, the informant died during the course of treatment at PMCH, Patna.
5. Though learned counsel for the appellant wanted to show the innocence as also that he do not have any criminal antecedent, learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer submitting that he was carrying the axe and the assault proved fatal.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid submissions, no relief can be extended to the appellant.
7. In that background, the impugned order dated 13.01.2026 passed by the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Bhojpur at Ara stands affirmed and the appeal stands rejected.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T