125 SATBIR SINGH SABHARWAL UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-4012 1. 39 days in filing the appeal certified copies of the same. 2. same are allowed and the delay of 39 3. LPA No.1643 of 2026 (O&M) 4. submits that the factual position given by the Learned Single Judge in Paragraph No.11 appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge. 5. 01-07-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-4012 LPA No.1643 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : SATBIR SINGH SABHARWAL VERSUS UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 4012-4013-LPA-2026 Present applications have been filed for condoning the delay of 39 days in filing the appeal and an application for exemption from filing the certified copies of the same. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application are allowed and the delay of 39 days in filing the appeal, Exempted from filing certified LPA No.1643 of 2026 (O&M) After arguing for sometime, l submits that the factual position given by the Learned Single Judge in Paragraph No.11 of the impugned judgment, appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge. Ordered accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH G NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4012-4013-LPA-2026 in/and LPA No.1643 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 01.07.2026 ........Appellant VERSUS UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) been filed for condoning the delay of an application for exemption from filing the Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the applications, the days in filing the appeal, is condoned. Exempted from filing certified copies of the same. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the factual position given by the Learned Single Judge in of the impugned judgment, is incorrect hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND been filed for condoning the delay of an application for exemption from filing the , the condoned. earned counsel for the appellant submits that the factual position given by the Learned Single Judge in is incorrect hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further ) SAPNA GOYAL 2026.07.02 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document