1 CGHC010396782025 2026:CGHC:28141-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 511 of 2025 1. Subra Singh Tomar W/o Virendra Singh Tomar Aged About 41 Years R/o Sai Villa Bhanta Village Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Ward No.61 Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. Virendra Singh Tomar S/o Omprakash Tomar Aged About 44 Years R/o Sai Vila Bhatagaon, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Ward No.61, Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Collector Raipur Office Of Raipur Collector, Raipur District- Raipur Cg 3. The Additional Collector Raipur Office Of Raipur Additional Collector Raipur District- Raipur C.G. 4. The Tehsildar Raipur Office Of Raipur Tehsildar, Raipur District- Raipur C.G. 5. The Superintendent Of Police Raipur District- Raipur C.G. 6. Police Station Purani Basti Through Sho Ps Purani Basti, Raipur District- Raipur C.G. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.07.08 17:39:07 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Government Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 08.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: “10.1 Quash and set aside the impugned memo dated 18.08.2025 issued by the respondent Additional Collector, Raipur, whereby the petitioners’ joint property has been directed to be attached and sold (Annexure P/1); 10.2 Direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession, use, and enjoyment of the petitioners’ joint property bearing No. 685/4, admeasuring 558.15 sq.meters, situated at Bhatagaon, Ward Nko. 61, Raipur, without following 3 due process of law; 10.3 Pass any other order(s), direction(s), or relief(s) that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just, and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the present petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan