IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 3299 of 2026. Decided on : 30 th September , 2026 Ankit Verma ...Petitioner. Versus HPSEBL & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Rajni Gandhi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Petitioner is serving as Assistant Engineer, Rajgarh, District Sirmaur. Under order dated 28.02.2026, he was transferred and posted in the office of CE (OP) Shimla Zone. 2. Feeling aggrieved, he instituted this writ petition primarily on the ground that the impugned transfer had been ordered on the basis of a DO note. Pursuant to the interim order dated 19.03.2026 passed in this writ petition, the petitioner is continuing to serve at his present place. Respondents have filed a reply to the writ petition giving the incumbency position of the petitioner, also highlighting therein that almost every transfer of the petitioner has been made on the basis of a UO note obtained at his instance. Even after the passing of the impugned transfer 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 order, the petitioner managed a UO note dated 10.03.2026 for cancellation of his impugned transfer order. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim order dated 19.03.2026 is vacated. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 30th September, 2026. (jai)