Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25154 (CHH)

SMT. BABITA DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/563/2026 · 2026-07-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010224532026 2026:CGHC:28079-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 563 of 2026 Smt. Babita Dhruw W/o Kailash Dhruv Aged About 35 Years R/o Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Mudapara, Tahsil And District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Block Education Officer Block Mainpur, Tahsil and District Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Nidhi Thakur W/o Neeraj Thakur, aged about 40 years Working as Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Patharra, Vikaskhand Fingeshwar, Tahsil And District Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. T.K. Jha, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Parth Jha, Advocate For Respondent No.1 & 2/ State : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08 .0 7 .202 6 1. Heard Mr. T.K. Jha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Parth Jhal, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 & 2. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2. By way of present writ appeal under Section 2 of Sub-Section (1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench Act, 2006, the appellant, who was petitioner in the writ petition has challenged the impugned order dated 02.02.2026 passed by learned Single Judge in WPS No.4467 of 2026 (Smt. Babita Dhruv Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has declined to grant any interim protection to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he wants to withdraw the instant appeal as the appellant has already joined the new place of posting. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra