MD. ZIYAUDDIN ANSARI @ MD. JIYAUDDIN ANSARI @ JIYAUDDIN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8196/2026 · 2026-09-03
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25151 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:26713 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8196 of 2026
------ Md. Ziyauddin Ansari @ Md. Jiyauddin Ansari @ Jiyauddin Ansari, aged about 29 years, S/o Md. Salimuddin Ansari, R/o-Matiyala, Sakardih, P.O.-Sakardih, P.S.-Govindpur, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate
: Mr. Rakesh Kr. No.2, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 03-09-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.201 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303(2), 317(4), 317(5), 112(2) & 3(5) of the BNS,
2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of theft of iron pipes and loading the same in a truck. It is next submitted that the allegations against him the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the only role played by the petitioner is that the petitioner loading the pipes in the truck and he has no knowledge about alleged iron pipe being stolen property. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-09 of this bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.07.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.201 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 03/09/2026 Abhiraj/