Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010534532013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11510/2013 Between:
1. A.MALLI REDDY, S/O KATAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC:LINE INSPECTOR, ENGINEERING SECTION, S.K.UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE HONBLE VICECHANCELLOR, SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, REP. BY IT'S REGISTRAR- CUM-CONVENER OF THE COMMITTEE, CONSTITUTED PROCEEDINGS, VIDE SKU/ESTT./E1/2013 DT:07.03.2013 BY VICE- CHAIRMAN, S.K. UNIVERSITY, S.K. UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
3. T UMAPATHI, S/O T.RANGAPPA (LINE INSPECTOR), Q.NO.C-3, S.V.PURAM, S.K. UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPUR.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. O UDAYA KUMAR SC For S K UNIVERSITY
2. P SREE RAMULU NAIDU
3. J NARAYANASWAMY The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that petitioner's grievance of not promoting him to the post of Assistant Engineer (Electrical) in the respondent university is challenged. It is submitted that there was no discrimination so far as considering the petitioner's case for promotion.
2. The written instructions are placed on record and the instructions would indicate that the petitioner's case was also considered by the committee. However, the petitioner was found in eligible and as such was not entitled for promotion as on the relevant date.
3. According to the written instructions, the writ petition is closed, leaving it open for the petitioner to initiate fresh proceedings on arising of any fresh cause of action. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.09.02.2026 SR