[2026:RJ-JP:16386] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11106/2025 Rasool Khan Kathat S/o Shyama, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Vill- Pakhariyawas, Post- Andheri Deori, Tehsil - Beawar, Rajasthan- 305901 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road, Ajmer Through Its Managing Director 2. Assistant Engineer (O And M - II), AVVNl, Sedriya, Beawar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aditya Jain for Mr. Aaryan Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sagar Jindal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/04/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the order dated 01.09.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11116/2025, titled Ganpat Singh v. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Anr, and has submitted that a liberty was granted to the similarly situated petitioner therein to file a representation before the competent authority. It is next submitted that further the authority was directed to consider and adjudicate the same within a period of four weeks, and in the meanwhile, an interim protection was granted directing that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner therein. 2. Learned counsel submits that the present matter possesses an akin factual matrix to that of Ganpat Singh (supra), and therefore, prays that the instant petition may also be disposed of in identical terms. [2026:RJ-JP:16386] (2 of 2) [CW-11106/2025] 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents is unable to refute the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and is unable to distinguish the applicability of the order dated 01.09.2025 to the facts and circumstances of the present case. 4. Having heard the submissions advanced, and taking note of the fact that the controversy at hand is squarely covered by the aforementioned ratio, this Court deems it apposite to adjudicate and dispose of the present petition in light of Ganpat Singh (supra). The ratio and directions passed therein shall be made applicable mutatis mutandis qua the petitioner herein. 5. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to file an appropriate representation before the competent respondent- authority within a period of 15 days from date of passing of this order. It is further directed that if such a representation is filed, the respondents are directed to consider and adjudicate the same by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. It is made clear that until the final disposal of the said representation, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 7. In view of the above terms, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand(s) disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /18