APHC010535922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4450/2024 Between: 1. C. PRATAP KUMAR REDDY, S/O. C. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC CONTRACT LECTURER IN CIVICS, NARM. GOVT. JR. COLLEGE, KALIKIRI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYAH DISTRICT, R/O. D.NO.10-147, BALAJI NAGAR EXTENSION, NEAR TIRUPATI ROAD, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KONA SESHIDAR IAS, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR KRUTIKA SHUKLA, COMMISSIONER, INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, D.NO. 12-426, SPS RIVER VIEW APARTMENT, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI S RAVI, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, ZONE IV, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. DR M V VIJAYA KUMAR, PRINCIPAL, NARM. GOVT. JR. COLLEGE, KALIKIRI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYAH DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to summon the Contemnors/respondents for their willful, wanton, intentional and deliberate disobedience of the orders p. 2 passed in W.P.No.18626 of 2024, dt.27.08.2024 and punish them U/s 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHUKKA KRANTHI KIRAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 27.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.18626 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in directing the petitioner orally not to attend the duties from 31.08.2024, on attaining the age of 60 years. 4. The writ petition was disposed of on 27.08.2024, in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in W.A.No.770 of 2022. 5. The contempt case was filed on 27.11.2024. In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleaded that the respondents have violated the order dated 27.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.18626 of 2024. 6. The contempt case was listed on 19.02.2026. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted the speaking order passed by respondent No.2 vide Rc.No.Ser.II-2/2615325/2024, dated 25.11.2024, in pursuance of the order dated 27.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.18626 of 2024. A copy of the same was handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. Since a speaking order was passed, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 27.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.18626 of 2024. Page 3 of 4 8. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.02.2026 TVN p. 4 156 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.4450 OF 2024 Date: 26.02.2026 TVN