CR No.3448 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Nitesh Yadav The State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present: JAGMOHAN BANSAL 1. Constitution of India (Annexure P stayed the execution proceedings. 2. respondent Nos. 5 and 7 which is taken on record. the same at an appropriate 3. adoption deed and Will executed by Mr. Dalip entitled to the compensation awarded by Gurugram suit assailing CR No.3448-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of decision : Nitesh Yadav Versus The State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 3 and 4-HSIIDC. Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 5 and 7. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. ( Oral ) The petitioner through instant petition under Article Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 23.02.2026 (Annexure P-1) whereby learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram has stayed the execution proceedings. Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate filed power of attorney on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 7 which is taken on record. the same at an appropriate place. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is registered adoption deed and Will executed by Mr. Dalip entitled to the compensation awarded by vide award dated 19.05.2023. suit assailing veracity of adoption deed and W -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-3448-2026 Date of decision : 02.07.2026 …….Petitioner ...….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL , Advocate, Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate, HSIIDC. Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate, The petitioner through instant petition under Article 227 of the setting aside of order dated 23.02.2026 Additional District Judge, Gurugram has Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate filed power of attorney on behalf of respondent Nos. 5 and 7 which is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is registered adoption deed and Will executed by Mr. Dalip Singh in his favour, thus, he is entitled to the compensation awarded by learned Additional District Judge, vide award dated 19.05.2023. The respondents have filed a civil veracity of adoption deed and Will. Their stay application stands 227 of the setting aside of order dated 23.02.2026 Additional District Judge, Gurugram has Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate filed power of attorney on behalf of Registry is directed to tag Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is registered in his favour, thus, he is Additional District Judge, The respondents have filed a civil Their stay application stands AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.02 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR No.3448-2026 -2- dismissed. Adjudication of civil suit would take quite long time and during said period, compensation received from the Government cannot be kept with Executing Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that it would not be appropriate to disburse compensation to the petitioner because the respondents are legal heirs of deceased Dalip Singh. They have no objection if the Civil Court is directed to adjudicate their suit in a time bound manner. 5. From a perusal of record, it is evident that petitioner is claiming disbursement of compensation on the ground that adoption deed and Will is in his favour. The respondents have filed civil suit No.CS-2585-2025 which is pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram. Disbursement of awarded compensation to petitioner before adjudication of suit filed by respondents would not be just and fair. It would be in the interest of both the parties if at least the aforesaid civil suit is adjudicated. 6. To resolve the matter, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram is requested to adjudicate the aforesaid civil suit expeditiously and preferably within 02 years from today. The Executing Court would disburse awarded compensation as per rights determined by the Civil Court in the aforesaid suit. Filing of appeal by any party would not inhibit the Executing Court to adjudicate the execution application. In the meantime, the awarded compensation may be kept in the shape of FDR with any bank. 7. Disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) July, 02, 2026 JUDGE Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2026.07.02 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document