APHC010533742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3056/2025 Between: 1. SRI R MOHAN LAL AGARWAL, S/O. R.RADHESHYAM AGARWAL, AGED 38 YEARS R/O. CHINNA TIPPA SAMUDRAM(CTM) REVENUE VILLAGE, MADANAPALLE MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI B. SYAMALA,, W/O. B. SREERAMULU, R/O. 15-110, C.T.M,(CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM), CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517319. 3. SRI. S. SIVA REDDY,, S/O. S. VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED 57 YRS. R/O. 15-52, MITTAPALII VILLAGE, C.T.M, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517319. 4. SRI. Y. VIMALA,, W/O. Y. RAVI KUMAR, R/O. C.T.M,(CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM), MADANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517319. 5. SRI B. BHUDEVI,, W/O. B. REDDAPPAREDDI, R/O. C.T.M,(CHINNATIPPASAMUDRAM), MAANAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517319. 6. SRI. P. VENKATACHALAPATHI,, S/O. P. RAMACHANDRA, AGED 60 YRS. R/O. 7-40, KOTHAPETA, C.T.M, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH- 517319. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. SRI NISHANT KUMAR YADAV, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2. SRI KISHORE KUMAR REDDY, THE THASILDAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent herein for willful disobedience and non-implementing the orders passed by the Hon'ble Court dated 04-10-2024 in W.P.No. 26744 Of 2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.10.2024 passed in W.P.No.26744 of 2022. Sri R.Satish Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the pursuant to filing of this Contempt, the respondents have passed orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 11.07.2022, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt giving liberty to the petitioner to question the said orders. 3 Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. The petitioners are at liberty to question the orders passed by the respondents if they are so advised/desire. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 23rd March, 2026 RKS