Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25130 (CHH)

CHINGRU RAM MANDAVI @ CHINGRU MANDAVI v. UNION OF INDIA

WPS/7222/2022 · 2026-07-05

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010332222022 2026:CGHC:27784 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7222 of 2022 1 - Chingru Ram Mandavi @ Chingru Mandavi S/o Shri Mangal Ram Mandavi Aged About 31 Years R/o Village- Salepal, Kosopara, Post- Raikot, Tehsil- Tokapal, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Department Of Land Resources Watershed- Management Division, 2nd Floor, Annexe Building, Shivaji Stadium Shaheed- Bhagat Singh Marg, Connaught Place New Delhi. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmers- Welfare And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Upper Secretary Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmers- Welfare And Biotechnology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Bastar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Deputy Director Agriculture Cum Project- Manager, Wcdc, Bastar, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Project Manager Mili Water Shed, Burgum Nala, Block- Tokapal, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Meena Shastri, Advocate For respective respondents : Ms. Shoumya Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Banjare, CGC and Mr. Kaushal Yadav, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board -2- 06.07.2026 Heard. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that during pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been removed from services and therefore, she wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law. 2. No objection from other side. 3. Permission is granted. 4. With the liberty as prayed for, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha