RAJESH NARUKA S/O. SHRI ROOP SINGH NARUKA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16315/2024 · 2026-04-18
Ravi Chirania
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2513 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2513 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16397] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16315/2024
1. Rajesh Naruka S/o. Shri Roop Singh Naruka, Aged About 56 Years, Resident of 38-A, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj).
2. Sushil Jain S/o. Shri Dhan Kumar Jain, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of 102/19, Patel Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj).
3. Satish Kumar Vashisth S/o. Shri Radhey Shyam Vashisth, Aged About 57 Years, Resident of A-104, Jagdamba Nagar, Ajmer Road, Heera Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).
3. Managing Committee, Adarsh Vidhya Mandir, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj) Through Its Secretary.
4. Principal, Senior Secondary School, Adarsh Vidhya Mandir, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prahlad Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 18/04/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers:-
"(i) By issuing writ order or direction, direct the respondent to pay remaining 40% of salaries from the Month of April 2020, of the petitioners including D.A., H.R.A., A.C.P. along with interest @ 24% per annum.
[2026:RJ-JP:16397] (2 of 2) [CW-16315/2024] (ii) By issuing writ order or direction, direct the respondent No.2 to take action against the respondent No.3 and 4 as per the law. (iii) Direct the respondent to grant 3rd Selection Scale to the petitioners after completion of 27 years of service. (iv) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners."
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable as only Non-Government Educational Institution Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide the dispute raised by the petitioners in the present writ petition.
3. In view of the above fact, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file an appropriate application more specifically under Section 21 of the Non- Government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 for their grievance within a period of two weeks.
4. It is expected that the learned Tribunal may consider and decide the same in accordance with law.
5. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J SOURAV /100