APHC010541912013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12246/2013 Between: 1. DR.T.SURYA PRAKASH, S/O.LATE. T.CHINNA RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: TEACHING ASSISTANT, DEPT. OF HISTORY, S.K.UNIVERSITY, R/O. BUKKARAYASAMUDRAM (POST &MANDAL), ANANTAPUR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the salary attached to the post of Asst. Professor, History Department from 15.6.2005 as per the judgment dt. 11.9.2002 in W.A. No. 764/1998 and batch in the interest of Justice and equity to grant and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15137 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 grant interim direction directing the respondents to pay the pay scale attach4o the post of Asst. Professor, History as per the judgment dt. 11.9.2002 in W.A. No. 764/1998 and batch, pending disposal of the above Writ petition and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 90668 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R BALARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O UDAYA KUMAR SC For S K UNIVERSITY 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 3. J UGRANARASIMHA 4. J UGRA NARASIMHA(SC FOR SKU) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There was no representation for the petitioner on 19.01.2026. Today, when the matter was called there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.02.2026 PNS