Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010539752018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25513/2018 Between:
1. K. PRAKASH REDDY,, K.PRAKASH REDDY, S/O.SRI K.VENGAL REDDY HINDU, AGED ABOUT- 83 YEARS, OCCUPATION- AGRICULTURE R/O. PEAPULLY VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH KURNOOL
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. GUNTUR
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, PYAPALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT , AP
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not registering the Sale Deed presented by the petitioner with regard to the land in
2 JS, J W.P.No.25513/2018
Commercial area admeasuring 176 sq. yds. in Sy. No. 88/2, situated at Peapully Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, malafide and arbitrary and to Consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 to register the Sale deed in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 to forthwith process with the registration of the sale deed document pertaining to the land in Commercial area of the petitioner to an extent of 176 sq. yds. In Sy. No. 88/2, situated at Peapully Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. TRUPTHI AGARWAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3 JS, J W.P.No.25513/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.02.2026 rsd
4 JS, J W.P.No.25513/2018
169
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 25513/2018
Date: 02.02.2026 rsd