Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25107 (JHR)

RAJU MANDAL @ RAJ KUMAR MANDAL @ HIRANAND MANDAL @ HARINAND MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8201/2026 · 2026-09-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:26617] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8201 of 2026 ------ Raju Mandal @ Raj Kumar Mandal @ Hiranand Mandal @ Harinand Mandal, aged about 25 years, Son of Shyam Sundar Mandal, resident of Village Karikado, P.O. & P.S.- Saryahat, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prathik, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-03-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No. 157 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted Rs.12,50,000/- and the ornaments of the wife of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application, charge sheet has been submitted as mentioned in para-13, against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.05.2026 as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 29.06.2026 passed in B.A. No.765 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No. 157 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 03.09.2026 Amar/