( 2026:JHHC:26119 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No. 4970 of 2026 ---- Sudhir Oraon, aged about 29 years, S/o Sri Sukra Oraon, R/o Village & Post Husir, P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi, Jharkhand …..Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Jharkhand through Secretary Agriculture and Animal Husbandry department, Government of Jharkhand, Office at Nepal House, Doranda, PO & PS- Doranda Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Birsa Agriculture University through its Vice Chancellor Office at Birsa Agriculture University Campus, PO & PS-Kanke, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Registrar, Birsa Agriculture University Office at Birsa Agriculture University Campus, PO & PS- Kanke, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Director of administration Birsa Agriculture University Office at Birsa Agriculture University Campus, PO & PS-Kanke, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shashi Kant Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Bhawesh Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Divyam, Advocate --- 04/ Dated: 28.08.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for the following reliefs: “i. For commanding upon the respondents to regularize services of petitioner on the post of labourer especially in view of the fact that the petitioner has been working continuously in the respondent University on the post of labourer since 2015. ii. For commanding upon the respondents to at least enter the name of the petitioner in the sanctioned list of 773 casual labourers (Regular) considering the fact that the specially constituted committee has recommended the name of the petitioner alongwith 33 casual labourers for entering their name in the said sanctioned list vide letter dated 21.07.2023. However, till date the same has not been entered. iii. For commanding upon the respondents to pay the minimum scale to the petitioner which is being paid to the employees performing the same and similar nature of work in the university on a regular basis.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner is ( 2026:JHHC:26119 ) fully entitled for the prayer made in the instant writ application; however, in spite of representation dated 20.01.2026, the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such the petitioner may be directed to approach the concerned respondent by filing a fresh representation, who shall look into the matter so that the grievance of the petitioner can be redressed. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the respondent No. 2 to look into the grievance of the petitioner by treating this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the petitioner. The petitioner may serve a copy of this writ application along with the relevant documents to the concerned respondent for convenience. 6. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 28.08.2026 Abha/-