Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.34637 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2026
Deepak Sharma …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Chahat Goyal, Advocate
for respondents No.2 and 3 (through video-conference).
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)
After having argued for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition as the petitioner intends to approach the Court concerned for redressal of his grievances.
2.
In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn.
Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 01, 2026
JUDGE Yag Dutt
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.01 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.