Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25093 (KAR)

SRI M BHASKAR v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MFA/7291/2024 · 2026-06-25

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31846 MFA No. 7291 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7291 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN: SRI M.BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O. LATE MARAPPA R/AT BEHIND DR. JAYANTH CLINIC H.SIDDAIAH RAOD SHIVAMOGGA 577 201. …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJA L., ADVOCATE) AND: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER SHIVAMOGGA URBAN DEVELOMENT AUTHORITY (SUDA) SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …RESPONDENT THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1890 PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF THE COURT OF THE FIRST ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), AND CJM, AT SHIMOGGA IN LAC NO.144/1999 JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED DATED 17.06.2008, THEREIN FOR VERIFYING THE FACTUAL CORRECTION AND LEGALITY OF THE SAME AND THE MODIFICATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.06.2008 PASSED BY THE FIRST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, (SR.DN.) AND CJM, SHIMOGGA, IN LAC NO.144/1999 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND ENHANCED THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO RS.1,75,000/- PER ACRE TOGETHER WITH ALL THE STATUTORY BENEFITS LIKE, SOLATIUM, ADDITIONAL AMOUNT UNDER SEC.23 (1A) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31846 MFA No. 7291 of 2024 INTEREST @ 15% PA AND COSTS AS DETAILED ABOVE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Registry has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal in view of the judgment of this Court reported in ILR 2011 KAR 499. 2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that the subject value does not exceed ₹10,00,000/-. 3. In view of the same, the present appeal is not maintainable. Therefore, the objection raised by Registry is sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed off. 4. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to file such proceedings as may be permissible in law before the appropriate Forum. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31846 MFA No. 7291 of 2024 5. The time spent in agitating the matter before this Court, shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. 6. Registry is directed to return the certified copies, if any, filed along with the appeal to the appellant. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8