SUMEET AHLUWALIA AND ANOTHER v. EMAAR INDIA LIMITED
INCOMP/1323/2026 · 2026-07-01
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25092 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 150
INCOMP-1323-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.07.2026
SUMEET AHLUWALIA AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs.
EMAAR INDIA LIMITED
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- None.
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The aforesaid petition was filed on 27.02.2026 by Sh. Abhinav Sood, Advocate. The Registry had raised certain objections on the case file on 27.02.2026. The same was not taken back for re-filing after removal of objections.
2.
As per Rule 9, Chapter 1, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders.
3.
A note was published by the Registry in the cause list, whereby the Advocates were requested to collect their cases lying with objections. As per office report, message at registered mobile number of the Advocate/his Clerk was also sent, however, nobody has come forward.
DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.01 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
INCOMP-1323-2026 (O&M)
-2-
4.
The instant case is shown in the cause list for today i.e. 01.07.2026, however, no one is present.
5.
Keeping in view the aforesaid factual matrix, no further
order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the record.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE July 01, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.07.01 16:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment