Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25091 (JHR)

AFROJ SHEIKH @ AFROJ @ MD AFROJ @ AFROJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8171/2026 · 2026-09-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:26687] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8171 of 2026 ------ Afroj Sheikh @ Afroj @ Md. Afroj @ Afroj, Aged about 20 years, Son of Md. Azad Qureshi @ Md. Azad @ Azad Sheikh, resident of Chudi Mohallah Qureshi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-03-09-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giridih Town P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(3), 308(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted the Bank and wallet containing valuables and cash of Rs.8,500/- along with the important documents and cards after using force and tearing the shirt of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him in T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-8 of the instant bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.06.2026 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Giridih Town P.S. Case No. 91 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 03.09.2026 Saroj/