IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44167 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2024 Thana- Kavaiya District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Mala Kumari W/o Bablu Kumar Resident of Village - Naya Bazar Dalpatti, Ward No. 26, P.S. - Kabaiya, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Umesh Sao S/o Late Bhagwan Sao R/o Village - Sherpur, P.S - Chapra, District - Saran (Chapra) At present R/o Village - Naya Bazar Dalpatti, Ward No. 26, P.S - Kabaiya, District - Lakhisarai 3. Niraj Kumar S/o Late Om Prakash Sao R/o Village - Sherpur, P.S - Chapra, District - Saran (Chapra) At present R/o Village - Naya Bazar Dalpatti, Ward No. 26, P.S - Kabaiya, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rabi Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 15-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This application has been filed for cancellation of regular bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge 1st-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lakhisarai passed in Regular Bail Application No. 760 of 2026 arising out of Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 263 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 74, 351, 352, 92, 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons are said to have assaulted the petitioner and her husband. She Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44167 of 2026(2) dt.15-07-2026 2/2 also alleges that she was pregnant and was hit by the accused persons on her abdomen. 4. I have perused the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and do not find any error in the said order. Further, the petitioner has not been able to show any good ground to interfere with the impugned order granting bail to the opposite party nos.2 and 3. Hence, no ground for cancellation of bail is made out. 5. Accordingly, this cancellation bail application is rejected. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U