Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25089 (CHH)

SAWARNI KUMAR DUBEY, v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPC/216/2021 · 2026-07-07

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010009792021 2026:CGHC:28151 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 216 of 2021 1 - Sawarni Kumar Dubey, S/o Shri Tirath Prasad Dubey, Aged About 58 Years R/o Bhathapara, Ward No. 45, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Shiv Kumar Dubey, S/o Shri Tirath Prasad Dubey, Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Sakholi, Post Sakholi, Police Station Darima, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Ram Kumar Dubey, S/o Shri Tirath Prasad Dubey Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Sakholi, Post Sakholi, Police Station Darima, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Surguja, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh RUCHI YADAV Digitally signed by RUCHI YADAV 2 3 - The Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue) And Land Acquisition Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - The Executive Engineer, Water Resources, Division-1 Ambikapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 08.07.2026 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners, nor is there any representation despite the matter having been called twice. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Ruchi