1 APHC010543852017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1244/2017 Between: 1. T. SRINU, PRAKASAM DIST., A.P., 0CC: ATTENDER, A.P. RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BOYS), GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P SCL EDN GUNTUR DIST A P 2 OTRS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION (TRG) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. A P RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 3RD FLOOR GAGANVIHAR, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PRINCIPAL FAC, A.P. RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BOYS), GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, THRIPURANTHAKAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent suddenly in not 2 allowing the petitioner to his regular duty without giving any written order and without obliging vide Proceedings Rc.No. 29290/A1-3/2016, dated 21-05-2016 of the 2nd respondent, wherein the service of petitioner is continued by implementing the order dated 13-04-2016 of this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 12190 of 2016 as biased, arbitrary, illegal and capricious and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the 3rd respondent School as daily wages Attender to meet the ends of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 857 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in 06.01.2017 in WPMP.No. 1380 of 2017 in WP.No. 1244 of 2017 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 1380 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent herein to continue the petitioner herein in the 3rd respondent School as daily wages Attender in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above WP No. of 2017 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T SRINU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1244 of 2017 ORDER:- The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent suddenly in not allowing the petitioner to his regular duty without giving any written order and without obliging vide Proceedings Rc.No. 29290/A1-3/2016, dated 21-05-2016 of the 2nd respondent, wherein the service of petitioner is continued by implementing the order dated 13-04-2016 of this Hon'ble Court in WP No. 12190 of 2016 as biased, arbitrary, illegal and capricious and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in the 3rd respondent School as daily wages Attender to meet the ends of justice…” 2. Consequent to the death of counsel for the petitioner namely Sri Gade Venkateswara Rao, on 27.06.2025 this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner so as to engage new counsel. 3. Consequently notice sent to the concerned. Further, Registry put up a report dated 07.03.2026 with the following endorsement, as per the postal track notice sent to the sole petitioner “item delivered”. 4. Thereafter, matter again adjourned on 09.03.2026 and 11.03.2026, on those days also no representation for the petitioner. 5. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption „for dismissal‟ by specifically recording the petitioner‟s name in the cause list, no representation for the petitioner. 4 5. Indisputably, as per the endorsement dated 07.03.2026 notice sent by the Registry has been served on the petitioner. But he has not engaged any counsel nor appeared, which shows that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the lis. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.03.2026 RMR 5 235 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1244 of 2017 12.03.2026 W RMR