Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25082 (JHR)

NASEEM KHAN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6739/2026 · 2026-09-01

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26319 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.6739 of 2026 ----- 1. Naseem Khan aged about 69 years S/O Md Naim Khan @ Md Nayeemuddin Khan @ M.N. Khan At Present R/O Village, PO & PS Baliapur, Dist Dhanbad State- Jharkhand permanent resident of Village Pipcho, PO, PS Jainagar, Dist Koderma 2. Md Fahim Ahmad Naim aged about 45 years S/O Md Naim Khan @ Md Nayeemuddin Khan @ M.N. Khan At Present R/O Village, PO & PS Makatpur Dist Dhanbad State- Jharkhand permanent resident of Village Pipcho, PO, PS Jainagar, Dist Koderma … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, PO & PS Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department, Project Bhawan, PO & PS Dhurwa, Dist Ranchi. 3. The Commissioner, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag, PO, PS & Dist Hazaribagh. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, P.O., P.S. & District- Koderma. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Koderma, P.O., P.S. & District- Koderma 6. The Deputy Collector of Land Reform, P.O., P.S. & District- Koderma 7. District Sub-Registrar, Koderma, P.O.,P.S. & Distrct- Koderma 8. Circle Officer, Jainagar Anchal, P.O., P.S. Jhumri Telaiya District-Koderma. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to SC-I …...... 02 /01.09.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. By filing this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs: “i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction(s), particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding upon the concerned respondents, particularly, respondent no 8 to make online entry with respect to land with respect to land situated at with respect to the property situated at Mouza Pipcho, Thana No 108, Khata no 103, Plot no 1918, area 1.81 acres which is entered in register II of Jainagar Anchal on 2026:JHHC:26319 2 Page No 135/I in the name of Md Naim Khan. ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction(s), particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding upon the concerned respondents, particularly, respondent no 4 recognizing the petitioner and subsequently the purchaser as the rightful raiyats of the land, and to continue receiving rent for the land, issuing rent receipts and maintaining records in the name of the rightful owners henceforth with respect to all that a piece and parcel of land situated at Mouza Pipcho, Thana No 108, Khata no 103, Plot no 1918, area 1.81 acres. iii) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction(s), particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding upon the concerned respondents, particularly respondent no 6 to accept and duly register the sale deed executed by the petitioner if any for the land pertaining to all that a piece and parcel of land situated at Mouza Pipcho, Thana No 108, Khata no 103, Plot no 1918, area 1.81 acres. AND For issuance of any other appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction(s) may deem fit and proper for doing conscionable justice to the petitioner.” 3. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the respondents have not accepted the on-line rent and the Register-II has also not been uploaded in the portal. 4. Considering the grievance of the petitioners, I direct the petitioners to approach the respondent no. 8-the Circle Officer, Jainagar Anchal, PO and PS Jhumri Telaiya, District-Koderma along with the copy of this order within four weeks, who will consider the case of the petitioners and take a decision within eight weeks thereafter. If the claim of the petitioners is found genuine appropriate action will be taken within the aforesaid period. 5. If the claim of the petitioners is rejected for any reasons whatsoever the reasons should be communicated to the petitioners within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 01.09.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 05.09.2026