Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25079 (JHR)

SAKHI DEVI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6748/2026 · 2026-09-01

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26330 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.6748 of 2026 ----- 1. Sakhi Devi aged about 67 years Wife of Late Sristidhar Mahto; 2. Devki Devi aged about 54 years D/o Late Sristidhar Mahto; 3. Saraswati Kumari aged about 32 years D/o Late Sristidhar Mahto; 4. Santoshi Kumari aged about 30 years D/o Late Sristidhar Mahto; All resident of village Lowadih, P.O. Landupdih, P.S. Sonahatu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, P.O. -G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi. 3. District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi, P.O. -G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi. 4. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Khunti, P.O. and P.S. Khunti, District Khunti. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxman Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nirupama, AC to Sr. SC-I …...... 02 /01.09.2026: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioners that the principal amount of compensation in lieu of acquisition of the land has been paid but they have not been paid the Solatium and the Additional Compensation as per the Act. 3. Considering the grievance of the petitioners, I direct the petitioners to approach the respondent no. 3-the District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi along with the copy of this order, who will consider the application of the petitioners in respect of the payment of the Solatium and the Additional Compensation and decide the case of the petitioners within eight weeks. 4. If it is found that the petitioners are entitled for the said 2026:JHHC:26330 2 amount, the same will be disbursed to the petitioners immediately. If for any other reasons the claim of the petitioners is rejected the reasons thereof should be communicated to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 01.09.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 05.09.2026