1 CGHC010255272026 2026:CGHC:27897 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3474 of 2026 1 - Prafulla Kumar Agrawal S/o Shri Mahendra Kumar Agrawal Aged About 62 Years R/o Village -Magarchaba Tahsil Balodabazar Distt. -Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Atal Nagar District -Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Sub -Divisional Officer (Revenue ), Balodabazar Distt.- Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) 4 - Nayab Tahsildar, Balodabazar Distt. Balodabazar -Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL. SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/07/2026 1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing the respondent authorities to provide the copy of documents of revenue record for sale /vikray nakal to the petitioner with respect to 0.024 Hectare portion of Khasra no. 32/1, admeasuring 0.100 Hectare situated at Village Magarchaba, P.H.N. 06, R.N.M. and Tahsil Balodabazar, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.). AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.08 10:40:50 +0530 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities consider and decide the pending representations of the petitioner within stipulated time period. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, however, while doing so he seeks liberty to pursue his representation in the matter before the respondent authorities which was preferred by him on 12.06.26 and he submits that suitable direction may also be issued for expeditious disposal of the said representation. 3. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection with the limited prayer made by the petitioner. 4. Having regard to the submission made by the petitioner and the limited prayer made by him, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to pursue his representation which shall be decided by the respondents authorities in accordance with law within some reasonable period. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash