Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25072 (CHH)

CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PURUSHOTTAM GAIKWARD

WP227/456/2025 · 2026-07-06

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010160092025 2026:CGHC:28061 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 456 of 2025 Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Company Simran Tower In Front Of Lic Building, Pandri, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) (Insurer) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Purushottam Gaikward S/o Late Budharu Ram Gaikwad Aged About 37 Years R/o House No. 289, Risali Basti, Satnami Para, Risali Bhilai, Post Civil Centre Bhilai, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 490006 (Claimant) 2 - Devendra Kumar Bharti S/o Vedram Bharti Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 147, Ward No. 13, Village Kolihapuri, Post- Pisegaon, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) 491001 (Driver) 3 - Nutan Sahu S/o Late Lakhan Lal Sahu Aged About 41 Years R/o House No. 165, Village Bhatagaon R, Post And P.S. Jamgaon, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Balod (C.G.) 491223 (Owner) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.07.08 11:53:30 +0530 2 07/07/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present writ petition is now become infructuous as the main proceedings before the learned Claims Tribunal has already been concluded, and therefore, he does not want to press the present writ petition. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, however, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all available grounds in the challenge against the main order passed by learned Claims Tribunal, if so advised. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit