APHC010532522018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 25812/2018 Between: 1. GODABA YUGANDHARA RAO, S/O LATE GOPALA RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (UNDER RETIREMENT), GARUGUBILLI PACS GARUGUBILLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MARKETING AND CO-OPERATIVE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, PARVATHIPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, PARVATHIPURAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. THE GARUGUBILLI PRIMARY AGRL COOP SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, GARUGUBILLI, GARUGUBILLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th respondent in issuing the letter dt. 31-5- 2018 informing the petitioner that he has to retire from service w.e.f. 30-6-2018 on attaining the age of 58 years though he is eligible for extension of superannuation from 58 to 60 years, on par with the employees of APCOB and DCCB, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the G.O.Ms.No. 102 dt. 27-6-2017 and consequently set aside the same, by declaring that the petitioner is entitled for extension of superannuation age from 58 to 60 years on par with the employees of APCOB and DCCB, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the 2 High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to continue the petitioner herein in service, by suspending the letter dt. 31-05-2018 issued by the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.25812 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption 8For Dismissal9. Even on earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri G. Naveen, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 7th January, 2026 cbn 4 40 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.25812 of 2018 7th January, 2026 cbn