N. Sreedhar Reddy v. N. Reddappa Reddy @ Pedda Redappa Reddy
SA/1138/2012 · 2026-02-11
Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25069 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 25069 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
S.A.Nos.1037, 1080 of 2011 and S.A.No.1138 of 2012
COMMON JUDGMENT:
Aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 06.07.2011 in A.S.No.140 of 2007 and A.S.No.22 of 2008, on the file of the learned VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Madanapalle, reversing the judgment and decree dated 08.10.2007 in O.S.No.308 of 1996, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Piler, the present Second Appeals, i.e., S.A.Nos.1037 and 1080 of 2011 and S.A.No.1138 of 2012, have been filed. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of the Court that the parties have filed a joint memo dated 08.06.2026, seeking to record the compromise arrived at between the parties in terms of memorandum of compromise dated 27.11.2025. In all the Second Appeals the memo was filed before the Registry. 3. Appellant in S.A.No.1037 of 2011 and S.A.No.1080 of 2011, respondent No.1 in S.A.No.1138 of 2012 i.e., Sri N.Reddappa Reddy @ Pedda Reddappa Reddy and Smt. M.Reddi Rani, who is respondent No.4 in S.A.No.1037 of 2011 and respondent No.3 in S.A.Nos.1080 of 2011 & 1138 of 2012 are present through virtual mode. The learned counsel on record represents that they are old aged persons about 85 years and they are unable to attend the Court physically. They have filed copies of their Aadhaar cards and seek permission of this Court to appear through virtual mode. Permission is
2
accorded. The remaining parties appeared physically before this Court produced their copies of Aadhar in proof of their identification. 4. Sri P.Rama Bhopal Reddy, Sri S.S.Bhatt, Sri T.Balaji, Sri P.V.Raghuram and Sri K.Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel representing the respective parties are present before this Court and all the parties are identified by their respective counsel. 5. When this Court enquired about the compromise, the parties stated that they had settled the matter amicably by entering into a memorandum of compromise, and the appeals may be disposed of in terms of the said compromise. 6. In view of the same, these Second Appeals are disposed of by recording the memorandum of compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of in consequence. 8. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the memorandum of compromise dated 27.11.2025 to this judgment.
_______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 12.02.2026 MH
3
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
80
S.A.Nos.1037, 1080 of 2011 and S.A.No.1138 of 2012
Date: 12.02.2026 MH