Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 25068 (JHR)

MARIYA KHATUN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6912/2026 · 2026-09-03

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:26619 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6912 of 2026 ------ Mariya Khatun, Wife of Md. Usman Ansari, Resident of Village- Lataki, PO & PS-Jamua, Dist-Ranchi. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, PO, PS & Dist-Giridih. 3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Khorimahua, PO & PS- Khorimahua, Dist-Giridih. 4. Jainul Shekh, son of Late Jumman Shekh @ Late Sito Shekh, Resident of Kharagdiha, PO & PS-Jamua, Dist-Giridih. 5. Kurban Ansari, Son of Gafur Miya, Resident of Village- Kharagdiha, PO & PS-Jamua, Dist-Giridih. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III ------ 03/ 03rd September, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the order which is impugned in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is appealable. 3. Considering his submission and also the fact that the order impugned is appealable, the petitioner if so advised, may file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. 4. Once the appeal is filed along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, it is expected that the same should be considered and the appeal be decided on merits by the Appellate Authority. 5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of. 6. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 03rd September, 2026 R.S./ S.K.D/CP-2 Uploaded on 07 /09/2026