1 APHC010534202024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4454/2024 Between: 1. NANDYALA RAJASEKHAR REDDY, S/O LATE NANDYALA KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 68/118-1, ALANKHAN PALLI, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. NANDYALA AMARNATHA REDDY, S/O LATE NANDYALA KRISHNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. RESIDING AT D.NO. 68/118, ALANKHAN PALLI, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. CHENNURU BHAGYALAKSHMI, W/O C. SAMBASIVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. RESIDING AT HIG 40, SINGAPORE HOUSING COLONY, NEAR RIMS, PUTLAMPALLI, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. CHENNURU SUGUNA,, W/O C.LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 2/84-A, ALANKAN PALLI, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, LAND ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MR PEEYUSH KUMAR, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR SREEDHAR CHERUKURI, OCC DISTRICT COLIECTOR, KADAPA, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 4. ADITI SINGH, OCC JOINT COLLECTOR KADAPA KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. JOHN IRWIN PALAPARTHI, OCC REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T DIWAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V SRINIVASULA REDDY 2. T S RAYALU The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri T. Diwakar Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioners and Sri T.S. Rayalu, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5. 2. Sri T.S. Rayalu, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5, submits that all the dues have been cleared with interest calculated up to 06.03.2026. 3. Sri T. Diwakar Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the due amounts have been received by the Petitioners and therefore, no further cause survives. 4. Having so noted, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:06.03.2026 Vns 3