2026:JHHC:26759 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5929 of 2026 ------ Bank of Baroda, a body corporate constituted under the Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) represented through its Chief Manager ARMB Branch being Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Verma, son of Mr. Saroj Kumar Verma, both having their office at L.M. Square, Pee Pee Compound, P.O. & P.S. Lower Bazar, District Ranchi. … … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. District Magistrate-cum-Dy. Commissioner, Ramgarh, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. 3. Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-Sub-Divisional Officer, Ramgarh, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. 4. Superintendent of Police, Ramgarh, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. 5. District Certificate Officer, Ramgarh, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. 6. Circle Officer, Ramgarh, having its office at Collectorate, P.O. Ramgarh, P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Kaushik, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurav Mahto, AC to GP-I ------ 05/ 03.09.2026 By filing this Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "For commanding upon the respondent authorities to forthwith give effect to and implement the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, dated 03.08.2023 passed in Sarfaesi Act Case No.13/2023, by taking all consequential steps, including restoration of the Magistrate deputation and handing over vacant and peaceful physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner, 2026:JHHC:26759 2 in accordance with law, without any further delay or obstruction and any further requirement of payment of fee for magistrate and police force deputation." 2. Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and learned counsel representing the respondents. 3. At the outset, learned counsel representing the respondent - State submits that vacant possession of the mortgaged assets, has been handed over to the petitioner - Bank. 4. Considering the said submission, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this Writ Petition. 5. According, this Writ Petition stands disposed of, as the grievance of the petitioner - Bank, has already been redressed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 03rd September, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 07.09.2026